1. I’m a member of a large YouTube group:
A. Christian
B. Atheist
C. Other
____________________________________
2. When my group’s leaders are criticized, I don’t like it. They have power and influence because they are most often right.
A. Agree strongly
B. Agree
C. I have no strong opinion on this
D. Disagree
E. Disagree strongly
3. Some members of my group are guardians who take action against those who disagree with group positions. I’m grateful that they protect the group from troublemakers.
A. Agree strongly
B. Agree
C. I have no strong opinion on this
D. Disagree
E. Disagree strongly
4. Members of my group often label those holding opposing views as weak, stupid or evil. I can see their point.
A. Agree strongly
B. Agree
C. I have no strong opinion on this
D. Disagree
E. Disagree strongly
5. When someone in my group doesn’t agree with the rest of the other members, some of us apply pressure. It has to be done. People can’t just can’t be allowed to think anything and still be considered group members.
A. Agree strongly
B. Agree
C. I have no strong opinion on this
D. Disagree
E. Disagree strongly
6. When I do disagree with the majority opinion of the group, I keep quiet because it’s easy to let silence look like consent.
A. Agree strongly
B. Agree
C. I have no strong opinion on this
D. Disagree
E. Disagree strongly
7. Each of the following are negative outcomes of groupthink except:
Few alternatives
Not being critical
Being highly selective
Seeking expert opinion
8. Groupthink occurs in groups that have a history of conflict and disagreement.
True
False
9. It is a good idea to have the group leader offer his or her opinion during group arguments.
True
False
10. Once a group decides that an idea is bad, it should never revisit the idea.
True
False
I couldn’t stop thinking about Nicolas Hughes tonight….and about his death in mid-March…The landscape was still frozen in Alaska when he died. I thought also that he left no note, even though he had been thinking about his death for sometime before it happened. Christine Hughes, his partner found him dead in his workshop, hanged.
We are much too obsessed with gossip and scandal…This was a real and complex human being. He must have had to confront a lot when he was very young. Sometimes that makes it impossible to take a position of self-preservation.
I think about the reason he didn’t leave a note…I have to wonder why…Maybe the act. Maybe that’s it’s own reason…and no explication could have added more detail. Maybe.
Are there any conceptual limits to the possibilities of artificial intelligence?
2008 will be remembered as the year we all suffered and suffered BIG TIME. Financially it was the worst year since 1931. And in saying that I’m speaking about the track record for financial data that dates back 183 years. Yes, since 1825, only 1931 was a year in which the S&P declined more than 50%. WONDERFUL…
There were food riots, political unrest in seemingly stable countries like Greece. The underpinning of the civilized structure of the world seems to be under attack, but it is under attack from sources that are hard to find and harder to stop. What can we expect next? OMG I hate to even consider what 2009 will be bringing us.
I’ve been thinking about where human beings are in their drives to survive and from that about the future of our species…I find I agree with John McDowell who contended that we have two natures. The first nature is strictly Darwinian and is concerned only with fitness for survival. It is the nature we inhabit through our genes and it is a nature that is sometimes very rough.
But we also have a nature that we have been creating and it is still a work in progress. It is the nature that comes from our culture. And cultures can be good or bad. They can go wrong and sometimes they do in very atrocious ways…And so what this tells us is that we have a lot of possible conflicts. We need to try to solve that conflict and we have a lot of risks. But at the same time, we now have a measure of control . In other words, it is really for us to lose the ability to direct our own future.
Yes, every source of ancient wisdom tells us that we must meet our survival needs first. Yes, the fitness imperative for survival is the first priority…BUT it is far more complex than that. But we also need environments where human beings can thrive. Where they can develop their talents, find friendships and form deep emotional bonds that are more complex than those driven by simple crude survival.
I don’t like to write about things political in this blog, but I feel the necessity write to this one entry . The McCain/Palin and campaign have been following the advice of Hitler’s propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels. Goebbels is the man credited with a savvy political strategy of telling the big lie.
In their latest political ads they have feigned outrage at Obama’s criticism of McCain’s proposals in which he said the “lipstick on a pig”. It is obvious that Obama was referring strictly to McCain’s weak proposals for “change” but in a cynical bid for votes, the McCain people have pretended to believe that Obama was referring to Gov. Palin. They know better! They know what they’re saying is a fraud and a lie, but they have been engaged in political vote pandering for such a long time that they refuse to do the honorable thing and tell the truth.
The situation is nauseating, and it is destroying the fabric of American life. Because their strategies seem to be working, they see no need to inject integrity, decency, or truth telling. They are doing what is expedient. They will do anything for votes.
Obama is trying to counter act their sleaze by issuing denials in the form of emphatic statements about his intentions and is also adding words about his determination not to be a swift boated. It is unclear whether Americans are awake enough to understand what is being done to them. If they don’t understand that the battle is lost.
We’ll know more on November 5.
I’m doing this by dictation and seeing if I can get it to publish.
I’m reading The Sun and Moon Corrupted a novel by Philip Ball. It is a bit intimidating to see the plethora of reviews saying worshipful things about Mr Ball, for example, ” one of the smartest science writers working in Britain.” It’s proving to be an interesting read, but I have to admit that so far, I’m a bit disappointed. Perpetual motion machines? Mad physicists? Castles and alchemy in the mysterious outer reaches of Transylvania? Yes, it’s a very odd book indeed.
I think I’m mildly disappointed with what I’ve read so far. I think I’m unconsciously comparing it to a book I which impressed me so much I’m on my second time through it. It’s called A World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy of Godel and Einstein by Palle Yourgrau, a non-fiction account of the late friendship of Albert Einstein and Kurt Godel, and I thought that Godel’s attempt to rewrite relativity was both more intellectually engaging and made better sense, at least to me.
No doubt Philip Ball’s book reminded me of the other because both depict the obsessive behavior of a passionate mind in the grip of an obsessive idea. The idea central to both books concerns possible flaws in Einstein’s theory of relativity.
But I think I’m prejudging. I’ll write more after I’ve actually finished reading. It is certainly unfair to judge until then.
YouTube quality is restricted to excellent documentaries like this BBC treatment,
Dangerous Knowledge which originally aired in 2007
I’ve given up on YouTube. It has become a cesspool of racism, hater abuse and pointless tirades by the certifiably mad. After trying the site for eight months I left it completely disillusioned with the low caliber of what is being uploaded there.
It seems you have your choice between adorable pet videos, neo-Nazi racial hatred and stupidity, or the rants of the insane who think they must destroy the world to save it. It would be comical if it weren’t such a ridiculous waste of time.
The truth is accessing YouTube is so toxic it should only be possible to do so after you’ve signed a disclaimer and agreed not to hold YT responsible for any brain damage which you might suffer while you’re there.
At least sixty percent of the “serious” videos on the site consist of childish ad hominem attacks, misguided “logic” from the chronically analytically impaired. I have felt a great sense of exhilaration after finally realizing that the whole thing is a sad waste of time and leaving it.
It is interesting that it so easy to loose perspective when you are actively engaged in an activity. You only realize you’ve just been wasting time after you’ve unfortunately wasted lots and lots of it. I think I was using it as an excuse NOT to work hard enough and NOT to do enough research.
I need to get a grip on my writing schedule again. I’m in the middle of a complex writing assignment…And the combination of the grueling demands of that and my frivolous time wasting on YouTube, I’ve almost completely allowed other parts of my life to fall apart.
I’m reconnecting with the real world and trying to convince friends, family and work acquaintances that the rumors of my death were greatly exaggerated.
My Present Research Foci include:
1. AI, self-reference and Godel’s Incompleteness theorem. It’s for my project…And it’s quite complicated…
2. As a outgrowth of that, I need to also understand possible applications to artificial intelligence. The recent research into this has made some very intriguing advanced.
If the technology existed, how far would you be willing to go in the pursuit of transhumanism?
1. Nowhere: I would not accept any technology or other assistance into my body, including medical appliances like pacemakers to save my life.
2. Where I am right now: I would accept technologies that would help me to function normally. No drastic measures though.
3. Beyond normal, merging of body: I would accept technologies, nano/machine or genetic, to improve my health to optimal and somewhat beyond, to ensure a healthy life until I die
4. Merging of body and life extension : I would accept #3, and also allow my body to live healthfully indefinitely (aka, until an accident inevitably kills me, or I get tired of living) at an age of my choice
5. Merging of body and mind: I would link my thinking capacity to technologies, genetic or mechanic, which would intensely increase my cognitive abilities, to the point of being able to multitask managing multiple complex tasks, to hold vast amounts of information and models to be called at will, to be able to reason with unthinkable speed and depth, etc
6. Beyond merging: I would not mind totally leaving human genetics behind, and modifying myself every day with new advances in technology, up to and including having powers which mythologies once attributed to the gods.
7. Beyond material existence: I would accept a total transformation. For example, I would consent to becoming part of a computer program, if it would mean I would become immortal.
Please choose a number and explain why you chose it. Add your response to either the video’s comments section, or better yet, add a video response.